Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:18

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Does having the wrong address on my car insurance invalidate my policy?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
When did you realize that your childhood was not normal?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Power Rankings: Rocket Classic - PGA Tour
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Will Ferrell Developing ‘Eurovision’ Movie Into Broadway Musical - The Hollywood Reporter
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Eli Lilly drug preserves lean mass in patients losing weight on Wegovy - STAT
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce spotted at wedding in Knoxville - WBIR